It’s a big week in the world of technology. The W3C consortium has proposed we create markup language to capture emotion. I am <thrilled></thrilled>!
“As the web is becoming ubiquitous, interactive, and multimodal, technology needs to deal increasingly with human factors, including emotions. The present draft specification of Emotion Markup Language 1.0 aims to strike a balance between practical applicability and scientific well-foundedness. The language is conceived as a “plug-in” language suitable for use in three different areas: (1) manual annotation of data; (2) automatic recognition of emotion-related states from user behavior; and (3) generation of emotion-related system behavior.” Read the full post here.
The W3C consortium, one of the governing bodies for WEb standards today, posted this earlier this week. The significance of this proposal is massive. This may in fact, be bigger than any sort of Apple announcement you or I may have heard about. I mean this. And I say this mostly speaking as a student of human computer interaction. There are ethical and technological implications in this proposal that suddenly draw a wider line across the horizon. I also write this post from a fiction writer’s perspective, because implications of an emotional markup language could truly spark any speculative writer’s inspiration. Just think about it….the machines may be able to assess what we are feeling someday. But let’s address this first from the human computer interaction side for the sake of not getting carried away.
Thinking about emotion in a scientific fashion is nothing new. In the worlds of the humanities, emotions are concepts we have been trying to understand and harness. The Greek philosophers did their part, as did Shakespeare, Freud, Jung and many others. What you may not know, dear Gentle Reader, is that computer scientists are also involved in exploring, capturing, and expressing emotion. One of my own professors at DePaul University, Clark Elliott, happens to be one of the these very scientists. He’s focused his work on the exploration of emotion and computer agents that can interact with human users in an emotional context. Yes, we are talking about concepts of artificial intelligence, but not in the way that you think. These are not Hal 2000 or Priss models. Elliott’s agents work based on algorithms that seek to respond to human interaction by interpreting human emotion as a set of goals, which when met or not met, generate one of several emotions on the human user. So, no, these are not programs of true artificial intelligence.
But let’s not get carried away. This post is not about artificial intelligence. No matter what you may be reading out there in the vast caverns of the Internet, we do not have artificial intelligence systems that are anywhere close to being what we would call truly intelligent. Heck, we can’t even understand how the brain, body and mind truly work yet. It would be silly to think we can actually model systems after something that’s not truly defined.
Here is what’s significant about emotional markup tags. This first foray into capturing emotion has probably been applied in several doctoral dissertations and in privately funded research. I have not doubt about it. However, instituting a standard for capturing emotion across the *Web* suddenly opens up a vast, and I mean really vast, set of possible data. With so many millions of Internet users, can you imagine the possibilities of using these tags to measure emotion as they interact with each other (and with computer systems)?
Maybe you cannot. But you should. It could be a very interesting future. Maybe by then we will understand the human brain better. Maybe by then we will also have more capable systems and applications. But we can definitely say that emotion is one of the facets of the mind that makes us distinguishably human. We often think of emotion as abstract, and tangible, yet this simple step in Web markup could actually bring us closer to a future where the intangible becomes real. For now we’ll let writers speculate in science fiction, and let the scientists do some work. But this announcement is a big one. We’ll look back on it one day.




I'm the author of "The 12 Burning Wheels," a short story collection of weird tales of future dystopias, hybrid monsters and machine lore.